What was found
Mercury, pesticides, and a pathway into the house
The contaminants in this record are named, but not quantified. DEC has published the list and the exceedance; it has not published a single concentration. That distinction governs this whole page.
The contaminants named in the record
Two sources name substances: DEC’s own fact sheets, and reporting by the Niagara Gazette. They are listed separately below because they do not carry the same weight.
| Substance | Named by | Where |
|---|---|---|
| Mercury | NYSDEC Primary | 1992–93 assessments and the 2025–26 investigation1 |
| Pesticides | NYSDEC Primary | 1992–93 assessments and the 2025–26 investigation1 |
| “Other contaminants”, unspecified | NYSDEC Primary | Fact sheet wording, both 2026 updates1 |
| Lead | Niagara Gazette Reporting | 15 and 20 June 202654 |
| BHC (benzene hexachloride) | Niagara Gazette Reporting | 15 June 20265 |
| PCBs | Niagara Gazette Reporting | 20 June 20264 |
| Other organic chemicals | Niagara Gazette Reporting | 15 and 20 June 202654 |
DEC’s September 2026 update states that sampling results were “provided directly to the property owners.”1 No per-property or per-contaminant concentrations appear anywhere in the public file. Any figure you see attached to this story — a parts-per-million value, a multiple of a standard — did not come from the public record. This site publishes none.
Where in the ground it sits
DEC describes the material as mostly subsurface soil rather than at the surface.5 That matters for how people could be exposed: it points away from casual surface contact and toward two other routes — disturbing the ground, and vapour moving upward into buildings.
As of 1 September 2026, DEC states that results from participating properties “confirmed some impacts to indoor air and soil.”1 Both routes, in other words, are now documented as real at some addresses.
The mechanism
Soil vapour intrusion
This is the term that runs through every DEC document about the site, and it is worth understanding precisely. New York State defines it as the process by which chemicals in the ground can enter the indoor air of a building through its basement, crawlspace or slab.112
Buried volatile chemicals evaporate into the air spaces between soil particles. That soil gas moves toward lower pressure — and a heated building is usually at slightly lower pressure than the ground beneath it. Gas follows cracks, utility penetrations and sump openings into the lowest level, then distributes through the house. Nothing has to be spilled or handled for it to happen; the material can sit undisturbed metres down.
It is also why DEC’s sampling programme pairs two measurements at once: a sub-slab sample of the gas directly beneath the floor, and an indoor air sample inside the living space. One without the other cannot tell you whether what is in the ground is getting in.
Follow the pathwayHover or tap any layer of the section to read what the record actually says about it. Nothing here is a measurement of any individual property.
Buried industrial material in the soil beneath and around a property.
Volatile chemicals evaporate from soil and groundwater into the air spaces in the ground.
It moves upward and gathers beneath the basement floor, crawlspace or slab — the sub-slab space DEC samples.
Through cracks, joints and utility penetrations. This is the pathway DEC confirmed had impacts at participating properties in September 2026.1
The sampling programme
What DEC actually tests, and what each test answers
DEC and DOH built a three-part plan for properties on the western tip. Each part answers a different question.1
| What is sampled | How | The question it answers |
|---|---|---|
| Surface soil | Up to four locations per property, by hand digging or augering15 | Is there anything in the ground people touch — gardens, lawns, where children play? |
| Sub-slab soil vapour and indoor air | Paired samples, one beneath the floor and one in the living space1 | Are chemicals underground getting into the air inside the building? |
| Sump water | Collected from homes that have a sump1 | Is groundwater moving through the fill and arriving inside the house? |
What an exceedance of a screening level means
DEC’s December 2025 results showed “exceedances of DEC screening levels in residential settings for several contaminants.”1 A screening level is a decision threshold, not a line between safe and poisoned. Exceeding one is what obliges an agency to look further; it does not by itself establish that anyone has been harmed, and staying under one does not prove nobody could be.
It is also why DEC’s language shifted between February and September 2026. In February the agency was investigating a possibility. By September it reported that findings had “confirmed some impacts to indoor air and soil” at participating properties.1 That is a change in what is established, and it is the reason the investigation grew rather than closed.
This site does not assess health risk, and cannot. New York State’s Department of Health runs a Bureau of Environmental Exposure Investigation, named in DEC’s fact sheet as the contact for exactly these questions: beei@health.ny.gov.1 DOH also publishes general guidance on soil vapour intrusion.12
A note on discipline
The July 2026 data that is not summarised here
On 23 July 2026 DEC posted an analytical report for Griffon Park covering soil, sediment and groundwater samples that reached Pace Analytical Services on 17 June 2026. The suite was broad: volatile and semivolatile organics, 1,4-dioxane, organochlorine pesticides, PCBs, total metals, anions and general chemistry.11
The document’s own title carries the word unvalidated. Laboratory data becomes usable for decisions only after a validation step that checks holding times, blanks, duplicates, recoveries and qualifiers. Until DEC completes that, any figure pulled from those tables could move or be rejected outright.
So the report is indexed in the document library and linked in full, and not one number from it appears on this site. When DEC posts validated results, they will be summarised here with the date they were validated.
Sources on this page
- NYSDEC, West Cayuga Island — Site Investigation Update (1 September 2026); and Investigation (9 February 2026). Primary
- Mark Scheer, “Two decades since DEC last probed Cayuga Island contaminants”, Niagara Gazette, 20 June 2026. Reporting
- Mark Scheer, “DEC: chemical sampling underway on west end of Cayuga Island”, Niagara Gazette, 15 June 2026. Reporting
- NYSDEC, Field Activities Report — Inactive Landfill Initiative, Griffon Park, 9 March 2023. Primary
- NYSDEC / Pace Analytical Services, Griffon Park July 2026 Analytical Report (unvalidated), 23 July 2026. Primary
- New York State Department of Health, Soil Vapor Intrusion. Primary